ArticlePharmaceutics2024
Pharmacokinetic Simulation and Area under the Curve Estimation of Drugs Subject to Enterohepatic Circulation.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Mycophenolate Sodium Enteric-Coated Tablets Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Four-Period Replicated Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Applicability of next-generation risk assessment generic PBK models and their performance within the chemical domain.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Link between physical activity, nutrition, and antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy: Implications for resistance management.SAGE open medicine · 2026Review
- Modified Method for Double Cannulation of Rat Bile Duct and Intestine for Pharmacokinetic Studies.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Gallic acid: a dietary metabolite's therapeutic potential in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enterohepatic circulation (EHC) is a complex process where drugs undergo secretion and reabsorption from the intestinal lumen multiple times, resulting in pharmacokinetic profiles with multiple peaks. The impact of EHC on area under the curve (AUC) has been a topic of extensive debate, questioning the suitability of conventional AUC estimation methods. Moreover, a universal model for accurately estimating AUC in EHC scenarios is lacking. To address this gap, we conducted a simulation study evaluating five empirical models under various sampling strategies to assess their performance in AUC estimation. Our results identify the most suitable model for EHC scenarios and underscore the critical role of meal-based sampling strategies in accurate AUC estimation. Additionally, we demonstrate that while the trapezoidal method performs comparably to other models with a large number of samples, alternative models are essential when sample numbers are limited. These findings not only illuminate how EHC influences AUC but also pave the way for the application of empirical models in real-world drug studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.