Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39204323›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2024

Advances in Modeling Approaches for Oral Drug Delivery: Artificial Intelligence, Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetics, and First-Principles Models.

Yehuda Arav

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yehuda AravDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Israeli Institute for Biological Research, P.O. Box 19, Ness-Ziona 7410001, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6016-634X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral drug absorption is the primary route for drug administration. However, this process hinges on multiple factors, including the drug's physicochemical properties, formulation characteristics, and gastrointestinal physiology. Given its intricacy and the exorbitant costs associated with experimentation, the trial-and-error method proves prohibitively expensive. Theoretical models have emerged as a cost-effective alternative by assimilating data from diverse experiments and theoretical considerations. These models fall into three categories: (i) data-driven models, encompassing classical pharmacokinetics, quantitative-structure models (QSAR), and machine/deep learning; (ii) mechanism-based models, which include quasi-equilibrium, steady-state, and physiologically-based pharmacokinetics models; and (iii) first principles models, including molecular dynamics and continuum models. This review provides an overview of recent modeling endeavors across these categories while evaluating their respective advantages and limitations. Additionally, a primer on partial differential equations and their numerical solutions is included in the appendix, recognizing their utility in modeling physiological systems despite their mathematical complexity limiting widespread application in this field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCFDdeep learningmachine learningmathematical modelsmolecular dynamicsPBPKQSAR

Identifiers

PMID39204323
PMCPMC11359797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.