Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39204249›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Postmortem Sampling in Piglet Populations: Unveiling Specimens Accuracy for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Detection.

Mariana Kikuti, Claudio Marcello Melini, Xiaomei Yue, Marie Culhane, Cesar A Corzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariana KikutiDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Claudio Marcello MeliniDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Xiaomei YueDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Marie CulhaneDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3547-7576
Cesar A CorzoDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-3496

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture MIN-62-137Swine Health Information Center 23-079 SHIC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specimens collected from dead pigs are a welfare-friendly and cost-effective active surveillance. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different postmortem specimens from dead piglets for disease detection, using PRRSV as an example. Three farrow-to-wean farms undergoing PRRSV elimination were conveniently selected. Samples were collected at approximately 8- and 20-weeks post-outbreak. Postmortem specimens included nasal (NS), oral (OS), and rectal (RS) swabs, tongue-tip fluids (TTF), superficial inguinal lymph nodes (SIL), and intracardiac blood. These were tested individually for PRRSV by RT-PCR. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and agreement of postmortem specimens were calculated using intracardiac sera as the gold standard. OS and SIL had the best overall performance, with sensitivities of 94.6-100%, specificities of 83.9-85.1%, and negative predictive values of 97.3-100%. TTF had high sensitivity (92.2%) but low specificity (53.9%) and positive predictive value (48.3%). While challenges in meeting sampling targets due to variable pre-weaning mortality were noted, PRRS was detected in all postmortem specimens. OS and NS showed promising results for disease monitoring, though TTF, despite their sensitivity, had lower specificity, making them less suitable for individual infection assessment but useful for assessing environmental contamination.

Indexed as

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingAnimalsAutopsySwinediagnostic accuracydisease monitoringpostmortem samplingPRRSV detectionspecimen sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID39204249
PMCPMC11356954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.