Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39204229›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Pilot Analysis for a Multicentric, Retrospective Study on Biodiversity and Difficult-to-Treat Pathogens in Burn Centers across the United States (MICROBE).

Lindey C Lane, David M Hill

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lindey C LaneDepartment of Pharmacy, Regional One Health, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9600-0472
David M HillDepartment of Pharmacy, Regional One Health, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1119-1901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following burn injury, patients are at increased risk of infection and are often cited as having a high incidence of difficult-to-treat pathogens (DTp). The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of DTp after burn injury, which factors are associated with their development, and subsequent outcomes. This single-center, retrospective study assessed patients with thermal or inhalation injury who had a positive culture resulting in initiation of treatment (i.e., excision, topical, or systemic antimicrobials). Demographic data, pathogen and resistance profiles, and prior exposure to topical and systemic antimicrobials were collected. Pathogens were considered DTp if they were multi-drug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), methicillin-resistant

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBurnsBurn UnitsAcinetobacter baumanniiAdultAgedBacteriaBacterial InfectionsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistanceburndifficult to treat pathogensrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39204229
PMCPMC11357020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.