ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Do Molecular Fingerprints Identify Diverse Active Drugs in Large-Scale Virtual Screening? (No).
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Leakage-Aware Drug Discovery Workflow for PKM2 and MAPK1 Integrating Scaffold Validation, Molecular Docking and Structural Triage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Identification of potential MenT3 inhibitors for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the generative artificial intelligence and SilicoXplore platform.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Deep-Sea Natural Product to Optimized Therapeutics: Computational Design of Marizomib Analogs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Rescuing Verubecestat: An Integrative Molecular Modeling and Simulation Approach for Designing Next-Generation BACE1 Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- From NMR to AI: FusingJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- A Benchmark Set of Bioactive Molecules for Diversity Analysis of Compound Libraries and Combinatorial Chemical Spaces.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Binding Potential and Stability of Drug-like Compounds with the Monkeypox Virus VP39 Protein Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Free Energy Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational approaches for small-molecule drug discovery now regularly scale to the consideration of libraries containing billions of candidate small molecules. One promising approach to increased the speed of evaluating billion-molecule libraries is to develop succinct representations of each molecule that enable the rapid identification of molecules with similar properties. Molecular fingerprints are thought to provide a mechanism for producing such representations. Here, we explore the utility of commonly used fingerprints in the context of predicting similar molecular activity. We show that fingerprint similarity provides little discriminative power between active and inactive molecules for a target protein based on a known active-while they may sometimes provide some enrichment for active molecules in a drug screen, a screened data set will still be dominated by inactive molecules. We also demonstrate that high-similarity actives appear to share a scaffold with the query active, meaning that they could more easily be identified by structural enumeration. Furthermore, even when limited to only active molecules, fingerprint similarity values do not correlate with compound potency. In sum, these results highlight the need for a new wave of molecular representations that will improve the capacity to detect biologically active molecules based on their similarity to other such molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.