Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39204078›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Review of Therapeutic Agents Given by Convection-Enhanced Delivery for Adult Glioblastoma.

Nathaniel W Rolfe, Nicholas B Dadario, Peter Canoll, Jeffrey N Bruce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nanotherapy of Glioblastoma-Where Hope Grows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathaniel W RolfeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-5185-4268
Nicholas B DadarioDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Peter CanollDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Jeffrey N BruceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-0286

Funding

CHRONIC CONVECTION ENHANCED DELIVERY (CED) OF TOPOTECAN FOR GLIOBLASTOMAR01CA161404 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRUCE, JEFFREY N · 2012 to 2017
$2.9M
NIH/NCI R01CA161404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma remains a devastating disease with a bleak prognosis despite continued research and numerous clinical trials. Convection-enhanced delivery offers researchers and clinicians a platform to bypass the blood-brain barrier and administer drugs directly to the brain parenchyma. While not without significant technological challenges, convection-enhanced delivery theoretically allows for a wide range of therapeutic agents to be delivered to the tumoral space while preventing systemic toxicities. This article provides a comprehensive review of the antitumor agents studied in clinical trials of convection-enhanced delivery to treat adult high-grade gliomas. Agents are grouped by classes, and preclinical evidence for these agents is summarized, as is a brief description of their mechanism of action. The strengths and weaknesses of each clinical trial are also outlined. By doing so, the difficulty of untangling the efficacy of a drug from the technological challenges of convection-enhanced delivery is highlighted. Finally, this article provides a focused review of some therapeutics that might stand to benefit from future clinical trials for glioblastoma using convection-enhanced delivery.

Indexed as

blood-brain barrierconvection-enhanced deliverydrug deliveryglioblastomahigh-grade gliomavolume of distribution

Identifiers

PMID39204078
PMCPMC11357193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.