Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39203962›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Tumor Neoepitope-Based Vaccines: A Scoping Review on Current Predictive Computational Strategies.

Luiz Gustavo do Nascimento Rocha, Paul Anderson Souza Guimarães, Maria Gabriela Reis Carvalho, Jeronimo Conceição Ruiz

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luiz Gustavo do Nascimento RochaBiologia Computacional e Sistemas (BCS), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Paul Anderson Souza GuimarãesBiologia Computacional e Sistemas (BCS), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Maria Gabriela Reis CarvalhoBiologia Computacional e Sistemas (BCS), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Jeronimo Conceição RuizBiologia Computacional e Sistemas (BCS), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.885815/2023-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais RED-00104-22National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 313108/2022-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic cancer vaccines have been considered in recent decades as important immunotherapeutic strategies capable of leading to tumor regression. In the development of these vaccines, the identification of neoepitopes plays a critical role, and different computational methods have been proposed and employed to direct and accelerate this process. In this context, this review identified and systematically analyzed the most recent studies published in the literature on the computational prediction of epitopes for the development of therapeutic vaccines, outlining critical steps, along with the associated program's strengths and limitations. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Searches were performed in databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct) using the keywords: neoepitope, epitope, vaccine, prediction, algorithm, cancer, and tumor. Forty-nine articles published from 2012 to 2024 were synthesized and analyzed. Most of the identified studies focus on the prediction of epitopes with an affinity for MHC I molecules in solid tumors, such as lung carcinoma. Predicting epitopes with class II MHC affinity has been relatively underexplored. Besides neoepitope prediction from high-throughput sequencing data, additional steps were identified, such as the prioritization of neoepitopes and validation. Mutect2 is the most used tool for variant calling, while NetMHCpan is favored for neoepitope prediction. Artificial/convolutional neural networks are the preferred methods for neoepitope prediction. For prioritizing immunogenic epitopes, the random forest algorithm is the most used for classification. The performance values related to the computational models for the prediction and prioritization of neoepitopes are high; however, a large part of the studies still use microbiome databases for training. The in vitro/in vivo validations of the predicted neoepitopes were verified in 55% of the analyzed studies. Clinical trials that led to successful tumor remission were identified, highlighting that this immunotherapeutic approach can benefit these patients. Integrating high-throughput sequencing, sophisticated bioinformatics tools, and rigorous validation methods through in vitro/in vivo assays as well as clinical trials, the tumor neoepitope-based vaccine approach holds promise for developing personalized therapeutic vaccines that target specific tumor cancers.

Indexed as

algorithmcancer vaccineneoepitopepersonalized therapytumorvariant calling

Identifiers

PMID39203962
PMCPMC11360805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.