Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39203914›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2024

A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Malnutrition in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.

Maciej Kołodziej, Julia Skulimowska

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maciej KołodziejDepartment of Pediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8123-2126
Julia SkulimowskaDepartment of Pediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8259-2916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common inborn disorders, with a prevalence of 0.8-1.2%. Affected children are often malnourished due to increased dietary requirements. This may lead to severe long-term complications. Several authoritative organizations have published guidelines addressing nutritional intervention in children with CHD. We aimed to systematically assess the consistency of recommendations, the methodological quality of these guidelines, and the quality of evidence supporting each recommendation. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database, World Health Organization Global Index Medicus, and 16 scientific societies' websites were searched for the period until September 2023. The guideline quality was assessed using the AGREE II tool. After screening 765 records, only 2 guidelines published in 2013 and 2022 met our inclusion criteria. The main reason for exclusion was the absence of any system for rating the evidence. The main issues concerned the lack of implementation advice or tools and the lack of criteria to measure the application of guideline recommendations. The included guidelines were of good quality and within specific recommendations, both publications were largely in agreement, and the score for the overall assessment was high (83%). There is a pressing need for comprehensive, multi-threaded guidelines incorporating implementation strategies and methods for the performance assessment of children with malnutrition and CHD.

Indexed as

Child Nutrition DisordersHeart Defects, CongenitalMalnutritionPractice Guidelines as TopicChildHumanscongenital heart diseasefeeding guidelinesmalnutrition

Identifiers

PMID39203914
PMCPMC11356818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.