ArticleMicromachines2024
Replication of Radial Pulses Using Magneto-Rheological Fluids.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The radial pulse is a critical health marker with expanding applications in wearable technology. To improve these applications, developing a pulse generator that consistently produces realistic pulses is crucial for validation and training. The goal of this study was to design and test a cost-effective pulse simulator that can accurately replicate a wide range of age-dependent radial pulses with simplicity and precision. To this end, this study incorporated a magneto-rheological (MR) fluid device into a cam-based pulse simulator. The MR device, as a key component, enables pulse shaping without the need for additional cams, substantially reducing the cost and complexity of control compared with existing pulse simulators. To evaluate the performance of the MR pulse simulator, the root-mean-square (RMS) error criterion (less than 5%) was used to compare the experimentally obtained pulse waveform with the in vivo pulse waveform for specific age groups. After demonstrating that the MR simulator could produce three representative in vivo pulses, a parametric study was conducted to show the feasibility of the slope-based pulse-shaping method for the MR pulse simulator to continuously generate a range of age-related pulses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.