ArticleMicromachines2024
A Comparative Study of Methods for Calculating the Dislocation Density in GaN-on-Si Epitaxial Wafers.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A series of characterization methods involving high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HR-XRD), electron channel contrast imaging (ECCI), cathodoluminescence microscopy (CL), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were applied to calculate the dislocation density of GaN-on-Si epitaxial wafers, and their performance was analyzed and evaluated. The ECCI technique, owing to its high lateral resolution, reveals dislocation distributions on material surfaces, which can visually characterize the dislocation density. While the CL technique is effective for low-density dislocations, it is difficult to accurately identify the number of dislocation clusters in CL images as the density increases. The AFM technique analyzes surface dislocation characteristics by detecting surface pits caused by dislocations, which are easily affected by sample and probe conditions. A prevalent method for assessing the crystal quality of GaN is the rocking curve of HR-XRD (ω-scan), which calculates the dislocation density based on the FWHM value of the curves. By comparing the above four dislocation characterization methods, the advantages and limitations of each method are clarified, which also verifies the applicability of DB=β29b2 for GaN-on-Si epitaxial wafers. This provides an important reference value for dislocation characterization in GaN-on-Si materials. The accuracy evaluation of dislocation density can truly and reliably reflect crystal quality, which is conducive to further optimization. Furthermore, this study can also be applied to other heterogeneous or homogeneous epitaxial materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.