Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39203598›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2024

A Review on the Machinability Enhancement of Metal Matrix Composites by Modern Machining Processes.

Pallab Sarmah, Kapil Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pallab SarmahDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein Campus, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa.
Kapil GuptaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein Campus, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1939-894X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

These days, metal matrix composites (MMCs) are being widely utilized in automotive and aerospace industries as prominent alternatives to traditional materials. Owing to their elevated strength-to-weight proportion, exceptional fracture toughness, and lightweight design, they can be used in a variety of applications. MMCs undergo extensive machining while making parts and components out of them. The machining of monolithic materials, such as metals and alloys, is a widely used and established process in different industries, such as the aerospace, bio-medical, and automotive sectors. Because of the properties of the metal matrix and the strong reinforcement, MMCs provide unique challenges. Modern machining processes have been found to be superior in overcoming challenges and achieving improved machinability of MMCs. An overview of MMC machining with modern methods is provided in this article. This article first outlines MMCs and addresses the need for and difficulties associated with their machining. Next, it reviews previous investigations on the machining of MMCs employing modern methods like electrical discharge machining, laser machining, abrasive machining, and hybrid machining. Productivity and surface integrity issues, including delamination and roughness, etc., are discussed. When presenting the review, the benefits and drawbacks of modern processes are also taken into account.

Indexed as

abrasiveEDMlasermetal matrix compositesmodern machiningproductivitysurface quality

Identifiers

PMID39203598
PMCPMC11356056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.