ArticleMicromachines2024
Fabrication of Cost-Effective Microchip-Based Device Using Sandblasting Technique for Real-Time Multiplex PCR Detection.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pico-Scale Digital PCR on a Super-Hydrophilic Microarray Chip for Multi-Target Detection.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Microinjection molded microwell array-based portable digital PCR system for the detection of infectious respiratory viruses.Nano convergence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The combination of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) and microfluidic technologies demonstrates great significance in biomedical applications. However, current microfluidics-based molecular diagnostics face challenges in multi-target detection due to their limited fluorescence channels, complicated fabrication process, and high cost. In this research, we proposed a cost-effective sandblasting method for manufacturing silicon microchips and a chip-based microdevice for field mPCR detection. The atomic force microscopy (AFM) images showed a rough surface of the sandblasted microchips, leading to poor biocompatibility. To relieve the inhibitory effect, we dip-coated a layer of bovine serum albumin (BSA) on the irregular substrate. The optimized coating condition was determined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (65 °C for 60 min). After sufficient coating, we performed on-chip PCR tests with 500 copies/mL Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) standard sample within 20 min, and the sandblasted microchip displayed a higher amplification rate compared to dry etching chips. Finally, we achieved a 50 min mPCR for screening five resistance genes of the endophthalmitis pathogens on our microdevices, with strong specificity and reliability. Thus, this sandblasted microchip-based platform not only provides a rapid, accessible, and effective solution for multiplex molecular detection but also enables large-scale microfabrication in a low-cost and convenient way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.