Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39203569›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2024

Dynamics of Cellulose Degradation by Soil Microorganisms from Two Contrasting Soil Types.

Grigory V Gladkov, Anastasiia K Kimeklis, Olga V Orlova, Tatiana O Lisina, Arina A Kichko, Alexander D Bezlepsky, Evgeny E Andronov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Grigory V GladkovAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, Podbel'skogo Highway 3, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5489-1414
Anastasiia K KimeklisAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, Podbel'skogo Highway 3, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0348-7021
Olga V OrlovaAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, Podbel'skogo Highway 3, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2154-503X
Tatiana O LisinaAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, Podbel'skogo Highway 3, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Arina A KichkoAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, Podbel'skogo Highway 3, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8482-6226
Alexander D BezlepskyAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, Podbel'skogo Highway 3, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0009-0005-2877-6008
Evgeny E AndronovAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, Podbel'skogo Highway 3, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5204-262X

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-16-00147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for active cellulolytic consortia among soil microorganisms is of significant applied interest, but the dynamics of the formation of such communities remain insufficiently studied. To gain insight into the formation of an active cellulolytic community, the experiment was designed to examine the colonization of a sterile substrate (cellulose) by microorganisms from two soil types: sod-podzolic and chernozem. To achieve this, the substrate was placed in the soil and incubated for six months. To assess microbiome dynamics, the experiment employed sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragment and ITS2 amplicon libraries at four time points. It was demonstrated that, from the second month of the experiment, the prokaryotic component of the communities reached a state of stability, with a community composition specific to each soil type. The results demonstrated no relationship between changes in community diversity and soil respiration. There also was no significant shift in the community diversity throughout the chronosequence. Furthermore, the taxonomic composition of the community shifted towards a decrease in the proportion of Pseudomonadota and an increase in representatives of the Bacteroidota, Bacillota, and Verrucomicrobiota phyla. The network analysis of the community demonstrated that, in contrast to sod-podzolic soil, chernozem is distinguished by a higher modularity, with the formation of taxon-specific groups of microorganisms at each stage of the chronoseries. These differences are attributed to the alterations in the eukaryotic component of the community, particularly in the prevalence of nematodes and predatory fungi, which in turn influenced the cellulolytic community.

Indexed as

amplicon sequencingcellulolytic communitycellulose decompositionchernozem soilsod-podzolic soilsuccession

Identifiers

PMID39203569
PMCPMC11356995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.