ArticleMicroorganisms2024
Evaluation of Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacilli and
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolism-Based Biomarkers for Rapid Phenotypic Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Rapid Bacterial Identification and Quantitative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Assessment from Positive Blood Cultures to Optimize Bloodstream Infection Management.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Multicenter evaluation of the QuickMICEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Investigation of the virulence, antibiotic resistance, and enterotoxin genes of methicillin-resistantIranian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparative Assessment of Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Bloodstream Infections in a Non-24/7 Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are life-threatening infections for which a timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is critical. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) directly performed on positive blood culture broths can help initiate targeted antibiotic therapy sooner than the standard AST performed on colonies isolated on solid media after overnight incubation. Faster antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results can improve clinical outcomes, and reduce broad-spectrum antimicrobial consumption and healthcare-associated costs in sepsis. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of a direct AST inoculation method on the BD Phoenix M50 system using serum separator tubes to harvest bacteria from positive pediatric blood culture bottles. Direct AST was performed on 132 monomicrobial pediatric blood culture bottles that were positive for Enterobacterales (65; 49.2%),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.