ArticleMicroorganisms2024
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When treating anaerobic brain abscesses, healthcare professionals often face the difficulty of identifying the causal pathogens, necessitating empiric therapies with uncertain efficacy. We present the case of a 57-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital with a fever and headache. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed a hemorrhagic lesion with wall enhancement at the left hemisphere on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Cerebrospinal fluid examination showed pleocytosis (23 cells/μL), an elevated protein level (125 mg/dL), and decreased glucose level (51 mg/dL; blood glucose was 128 mg/dL). Intracerebral hemorrhage accompanied by a brain abscess was clinically suspected. The patient received empirical treatment with intravenous meropenem and vancomycin for 2 weeks. However, conventional bacterial culture tests failed to identify the pathogen. We then performed shotgun sequencing and ribosomal multilocus sequence typing, which identified
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.