ArticleMicroorganisms2024
Sensitive and Accurate Quantification of Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) Viral Loads Using Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR).
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory enterovirus D68: virology, clinical surveillance, host-pathogen interactions, and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- A pooled testing strategy for enterovirus D68 to facilitate local, resource-conserving surveillance.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Respiratory infection with Enterovirus D68 induces severe acute lung inflammation in the pediatric ferret model.iScience · 2025Article
- Enterovirus D68 pneumonia in two older patients: A case report and literature review.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) is a reemerging virus that has been associated with numerous outbreaks in children in the past 10 years. Most assays examining viral infection kinetics have relied on the use of quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays as an assay of choice. Though valuable, there are inherent limitations that introduce variability, thereby reducing its value when comparing results across the field. Unlike the qRT-PCR assay that uses a standard curve to determine the copy number of viral RNA, the droplet digital PCR assay (ddPCR) directly quantifies the absolute number of copies within a given sample, which in turn makes the assay highly sensitive and accurate. Here, we have developed an EV-D68-specific ddPCR assay that effectively quantifies EV-D68 RNA copies in both cells and supernatants within a dynamic range of 6.7 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.