ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Rheological Performance and Differences between Laboratory-Aged and RAP Bitumen.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) binder extraction is not a cost-effective and sustainable option for a quick field study because it requires the use of a huge amount of solvent. Hence, most of the studies on asphalt pavement are carried out with laboratory-aged bitumen in accordance with well-established procedures, i.e., the pressure aging vessel (PAV). Unfortunately, some studies highlight the differences between bitumen aged in the laboratory and in service because it is difficult to reproduce extreme conditions such as real conditions, both atmospheric and load; and this also affects the choice and use of rejuvenators, sometimes compromising the interpretation of results. This study aims to compare the thermo-rheological behavior of a 70/100 bitumen aged with the PAV and two different binders extracted by RAPs. The rheological performances of bitumens were compared in temperature and by dynamic oscillatory tests and steady-state tests, resulting in strength and viscosity values higher for samples with RAP binders compared to the PAV sample. The same bitumens were tested with the addition of a 3%
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.