ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Introducing a Simple Tool of Patient Self-Assessment of Wrist Range of Motion.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand disorders can reduce wrist range of motion (ROM). The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic highlighted challenges in routine follow-up exams, making telemedicine a viable solution. This study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of patient self-measured wrist ROM using a self-designed goniometer template. The template was designed to measure flexion/extension and radial/ulnar abduction movements. A cohort of 50 adults (25 males/25 females) participated in this prospective study. The exclusion criteria included wrist immobilization and ages outside of 18-65 years. Participants self-assessed their wrist ROM with the goniometer template. Measurements were independently performed by a student and a specialist using standard goniometry, as well as a resident using the self-designed goniometer. The results were blinded for unbiased analysis. Mean differences in ROM varied across movement directions, with minimal differences for ulnar abduction and more substantial deviations for radial abduction, extension and flexion. The patient-specialist comparison showed deviations below 5 degrees for flexion and ulnar abduction in 50% of cases. Telemedicine, expanded by the COVID-19 pandemic, offers significant potential for hand rehabilitation. Current methods of ROM assessment lack cost-effectiveness and simplicity. Our method, demonstrating comparable accuracy for most movements, provides a cost-effective, reliable alternative for remote ROM assessment, enhancing telemedicine practices in hand rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.