Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39202310›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Clinical Significance of Combined Density and Deep-Learning-Based Texture Analysis for Stratifying the Risk of Short-Term and Long-Term Breast Cancer in Screening.

Bolette Mikela Vilmun, George Napolitano, Andreas Lauritzen, Elsebeth Lynge, Martin Lillholm, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Ilse Vejborg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bolette Mikela VilmunDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1924-9039
George NapolitanoDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas LauritzenDepartment of Breast Examinations, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
Elsebeth LyngeNykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Fjordvej 15, 4300 Nykøbing Falster, Denmark.
Martin LillholmBiomediq A/S, Strandlinien 59, 2791 Dragør, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1402-6899
Michael Bachmann NielsenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ilse VejborgDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2329-203X

Funding

Eurostars 5091 - 00036B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing a woman's risk of breast cancer is important for personalized screening. Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but parenchymal texture patterns offer additional information which cannot be captured by density. We aimed to combine BI-RADS density score 4th Edition and a deep-learning-based texture score to stratify women in screening and compare rates among the combinations. This retrospective study cohort study included 216,564 women from a Danish populations-based screening program. Baseline mammograms were evaluated using BI-RADS density scores (1-4) and a deep-learning texture risk model, with scores categorized into four quartiles (1-4). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for screen-detected, interval, and long-term cancer were adjusted for age, year of screening and screening clinic. Compared with subgroup B1-T1, the highest IRR for screen-detected cancer were within the T4 category (3.44 (95% CI: 2.43-4.82)-4.57 (95% CI: 3.66-5.76)). IRR for interval cancer was highest in the BI-RADS 4 category (95% CI: 5.36 (1.77-13.45)-16.94 (95% CI: 9.93-30.15)). IRR for long-term cancer increased both with increasing BI-RADS and increasing texture reaching 5.15 (4.31-6.16) for the combination of B4-T4 compared with B1-T1. Deep-learning-based texture analysis combined with BI-RADS density categories can reveal subgroups with increased rates beyond what density alone can ascertain, suggesting the potential of combining texture and density to improve risk stratification in breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

breast cancer screeningbreast densitymammographyparenchymal texture

Identifiers

PMID39202310
PMCPMC11353655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.