ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Predictive Accuracy of Anogenital Distance and Genital Tubercle Angle for First-Trimester Fetal Sex Determination.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Morphology of the Genital Tubercle: A Macroscopic Assessment and Ultrasound Approach on Early Fetal Sex Determination.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of fetal gender is crucial for managing gender-linked genetic disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of anogenital distance (AGD) and genital tubercle angle (GTA) for fetal sex determination during the first trimester.
methodsA multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted on 312 fetal cases between 11 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation from two tertiary hospitals. AGD and GTA measurements were taken from midsagittal plane images using ultrasound, with intra- and inter-reader reproducibility assessed. Binomial logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were employed to determine the diagnostic performance and optimal cutoff points.
resultsAGD had a mean of 7.16 mm in male fetuses and 4.42 mm in female fetuses, with a sensitivity of 88.8%, specificity of 94.4%, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.931 (95% CI: 0.899-0.962) using 5.74 mm as a cutoff point. For GTA, the mean was 35.90 degrees in males and 21.57 degrees in females, with a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 84.7%, and an AUC of 0.932 (95% CI: 0.904-0.961) using 28.32 degrees as a cutoff point. The reproducibility results were excellent for AGD (intra-operator ICC = 0.938, inter-operator ICC = 0.871) and moderate for GTA (intra-operator ICC = 0.895, inter-operator ICC = 0.695).
conclusionsThe findings suggest that AGD and GTA are reliable markers for early fetal sex determination, with AGD showing higher reproducibility. The findings highlight the feasibility and accuracy of these non-invasive sonographic markers and their potential usefulness in guiding timely interventions and enhancing the management of gender-linked genetic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.