ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Classification of Diabetic Foot Ulcers from Images Using Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning for diabetic foot care: accuracy trends and emerging directions in healthcare AI.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- AI-Based Models for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment: Scoping Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- A severity-aware multi-task CNN-transformer framework for explainable diabetic foot ulcer triage and mobile deployment.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Wound Infection in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical applications of machine learning for infection assessment in diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care: Advances in Diagnosis, Treatment, Prognosis, and Novel Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- DFU_DIALNet: Towards reliable and trustworthy diabetic foot ulcer detection with synergistic confluence of Grad-CAM and LIME.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) represent a significant and serious challenge associated with diabetes. It is estimated that approximately one third of individuals with diabetes will develop DFUs at some point in their lives. This common complication can lead to serious health issues if not properly managed. The early diagnosis and treatment of DFUs are crucial to prevent severe complications, including lower limb amputation. DFUs can be categorized into two states: ischemia and infection. Accurate classification is required to avoid misdiagnosis due to the similarities between these two states. Several convolutional neural network (CNN) models have been used and pre-trained through transfer learning. These models underwent evaluation with hyperparameter tuning for the binary classification of different states of DFUs, such as ischemia and infection. This study aimed to develop an effective classification system for DFUs using CNN models and machine learning classifiers utilizing various CNN models, such as EfficientNetB0, DenseNet121, ResNet101, VGG16, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, and InceptionResNetV2, due to their excellent performance in diverse computer vision tasks. Additionally, the head model functions as the ultimate component for making decisions in the model, utilizing data collected from preceding layers to make precise predictions or classifications. The results of the CNN models with the suggested head model have been used in different machine learning classifiers to determine which ones are most effective for enhancing the performance of each CNN model. The most optimal outcome in categorizing ischemia is a 97% accuracy rate. This was accomplished by integrating the suggested head model with the EfficientNetB0 model and inputting the outcomes into the logistic regression classifier. The EfficientNetB0 model, with the proposed modifications and by feeding the outcomes to the AdaBoost classifier, attains an accuracy of 93% in classifying infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.