ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Usage of Different Hyaluronic-Acid-Containing Artificial Tears and the Treatment Outcome of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Dry Eye Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Current practices and considerations in intense pulsed light therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of different hyaluronic acid (HA)-containing artificial tears on dry eye disease (DED) treatment in combination with intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and the participants received IPL therapy and HA-containing artificial tears. There were 42 and 40 eyes in the 0.10% and 0.15% HA groups after selection, respectively. The main outcomes were the postoperative non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), Schirmer II test results, ocular surface stain, and numbers of DED-related symptoms. A generalized linear model was utilized to produce the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the main outcomes between groups. At the three-month follow-up, the NITBUT was significantly higher in the 0.15% HA group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.