ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Benefit of Optical Coherence Tomography-Angiography in Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Study.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04074642 (OCT-angiography as a Pronostic Marker for Visual Impairment in Patients Undergoing Neurosurgery for Compressive Macroadenoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
OCT-angiography as a Pronostic Marker for Visual Impairment in Patients Undergoing Neurosurgery for Compressive Macroadenoma : a Prospective Study.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation Between Endocrine and Other Clinical Factors with Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness After Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Craniopharyngioma.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Fundus Blood Flow in Patients with Sellar Lesions with Optic Nerve Bending and Chiasmal Compression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Structural and Functional Outcomes of Optic Pathway Compression in Pituitary Adenoma: A Prospective Pilot OCT Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough visual field (VF) defects are common in compressive pituitary adenoma (CPA), their pathophysiology has not been fully elucidated. The mechanical theory (i.e., direct compression of the optic chiasm by the CPA) and the vascular theory (i.e., compression of the vessels supplying the visual path by the CPA) or their association could explain the visual impairment. The aim of this study was to determine whether the vascular density (VD) improved after surgical decompression of the optic chiasm in CPA patients and whether OCT-A could help to identify predictive factors for postoperative visual recovery.
methodsA prospective controlled study was conducted in patients who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: with CPA and without CPA (NCPA). All patients underwent a neuro-ophthalmological examination, VF testing, macular and optic disc structural OCT [retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thicknesses] and OCT-A before and then 1 and 6 months after surgery.
resultsTwenty-four eyes and fourteen eyes were included, respectively, in the CPA and NCPA groups. None of the VD parameters assessed by OCT-A were significantly improved after surgery in the CPA group. In the CPA group, the mean macular superficial VD was significantly decreased at 6 months. The multivariate analysis failed to identify any preoperative parameters predictive of postoperative VF improvement.
conclusionsOur preliminary findings suggest that the visual impairment observed in CPA patients could not be explained by the vascular theory. None of the preoperative OCT-A parameters allowed a postoperative VF recovery assessment. Trial registration number NCT04074642, ID-RCB 2019-A01186-51 date of registration 30 July 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.