Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39202036›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Emergency Awake Laparotomy Using Neuraxial Anaesthesia: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni, Tommaso Rossi, Marco Mercieri, Giorgia Cerati, David Michael Abbott, Giustino Varrassi, Gaetano Cattaneo, Patrizio Capelli, Manuela Mazzoni, Ruggero Massimo Corso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matteo Luigi Giuseppe LeoniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 29121 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-3733
Tommaso RossiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.
Marco MercieriDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 29121 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4321-6525
Giorgia CeratiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-0960-3732
David Michael AbbottDepartment of Surgical, Pediatric and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Giustino VarrassiPaolo Procacci Foundation, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3822-2923
Gaetano CattaneoEmergency Surgery Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.
Patrizio CapelliGeneral Surgery Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.
Manuela MazzoniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.
Ruggero Massimo CorsoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5446-6314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency laparotomy is a surgical procedure associated with significantly higher mortality rates compared to elective surgeries. Awake laparotomy under neuraxial anaesthesia has recently emerged as a promising approach in abdominal surgery to improve patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of using neuraxial anaesthesia as the primary anaesthetic technique in emergency laparotomies. We conducted a case series involving 16 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for bowel ischemia, perforation, or occlusion. Neuraxial anaesthesia was employed as the main anaesthetic technique. We analysed patient demographics, clinical characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome measures included the adequacy of postoperative pain control, the incidence of postoperative complications, and mortality rates. Among the 16 patients, adequate postoperative pain control was achieved, with only 2 patients requiring additional analgesia. Postoperative complications, including sepsis, wound dehiscence, and pneumonia, were observed in seven patients (44%). The observed mortality rate was relatively low at 6% (one patient). Notably, conversion to general anaesthesia was not necessary in any of the cases, and no early readmissions were reported. Our findings highlight the feasibility and potential benefits of using neuraxial anaesthesia in emergency laparotomies. The observed low mortality rate and the avoidance of conversion to general anaesthesia suggest that neuraxial anaesthesia may be a useful alternative in emergency settings. However, the occurrence of postoperative complications in 44% of patients indicates the need for cautious patient selection and close monitoring. Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to fully elucidate the efficacy, safety, and potential impact of this technique on patient outcomes in emergency laparotomies.

Indexed as

awake laparotomyemergency awake laparotomyemergency laparotomylumbar spinal anaesthesianeuraxial anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID39202036
PMCPMC11355271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.