Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39201991›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

Long COVID Is Not a Functional Neurologic Disorder.

Todd E Davenport, Svetlana Blitshteyn, Nicola Clague-Baker, David Davies-Payne, Glenn J Treisman, Sarah F Tyson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Long COVID: a long road ahead.Oxford open immunology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Todd E DavenportDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA 95211, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5772-7727
Svetlana BlitshteynDepartment of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3982-2031
Nicola Clague-BakerSchool of Allied Health Professions and Nursing, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4513-2889
David Davies-PayneDepartment of Radiology, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0007-3949-799X
Glenn J TreismanDepartment of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-6150
Sarah F TysonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M14 4PX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long COVID is a common sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data from numerous scientific studies indicate that long COVID involves a complex interaction between pathophysiological processes. Long COVID may involve the development of new diagnosable health conditions and exacerbation of pre-existing health conditions. However, despite this rapidly accumulating body of evidence regarding the pathobiology of long COVID, psychogenic and functional interpretations of the illness presentation continue to be endorsed by some healthcare professionals, creating confusion and inappropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for people living with long COVID. The purpose of this perspective is to present a clinical and scientific rationale for why long COVID should not be considered as a functional neurologic disorder. It will begin by discussing the parallel historical development of pathobiological and psychosomatic/sociogenic diagnostic constructs arising from a common root in neurasthenia, which has resulted in the collective understandings of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and functional neurologic disorder (FND), respectively. We will also review the case definition criteria for FND and the distinguishing clinical and neuroimaging findings in FND vs. long COVID. We conclude that considering long COVID as FND is inappropriate based on differentiating pathophysiologic mechanisms and distinguishing clinical findings.

Indexed as

chronic fatigue syndromeconversion disorderdysautonomiaimagingmyalgic encephalomyelitisneurasthenianeurologyphysical examinationpost-acute sequalae of COVID-19 (PASC)post-COVID-19 condition (PCC)

Identifiers

PMID39201991
PMCPMC11355889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.