Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39201984›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Breast Cancer Detection and Analytics Using Hybrid CNN and Extreme Learning Machine.

Vidhushavarshini Sureshkumar, Rubesh Sharma Navani Prasad, Sathiyabhama Balasubramaniam, Dhayanithi Jagannathan, Jayanthi Daniel, Seshathiri Dhanasekaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vidhushavarshini SureshkumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Vadapalani, Chennai 600026, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2955-9831
Rubesh Sharma Navani PrasadDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College, Salem 636030, India.
Sathiyabhama BalasubramaniamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sona College of Technology, Salem 636005, India.
Dhayanithi JagannathanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sona College of Technology, Salem 636005, India.
Jayanthi DanielDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Chennai 602105, India.
Seshathiri DhanasekaranDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0624-1991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of breast cancer is essential for increasing survival rates, as it is one of the primary causes of death for women globally. Mammograms are extensively used by physicians for diagnosis, but selecting appropriate algorithms for image enhancement, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification remains a significant research challenge. This paper presents a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD)-based hybrid model combining convolutional neural networks (CNN) with a pruned ensembled extreme learning machine (HCPELM) to enhance breast cancer detection, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. The model employs the rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation function to enhance data analytics after removing artifacts and pectoral muscles, and the HCPELM hybridized with the CNN model improves feature extraction. The hybrid elements are convolutional and fully connected layers. Convolutional layers extract spatial features like edges, textures, and more complex features in deeper layers. The fully connected layers take these features and combine them in a non-linear manner to perform the final classification. ELM performs classification and recognition tasks, aiming for state-of-the-art performance. This hybrid classifier is used for transfer learning by freezing certain layers and modifying the architecture to reduce parameters, easing cancer detection. The HCPELM classifier was trained using the MIAS database and evaluated against benchmark methods. It achieved a breast image recognition accuracy of 86%, outperforming benchmark deep learning models. HCPELM is demonstrating superior performance in early detection and diagnosis, thus aiding healthcare practitioners in breast cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

breast cancercomputer-aided diagnosis (CAD)convoluted neural networksextreme learning machinemammogrampectoral muscle removal

Identifiers

PMID39201984
PMCPMC11355507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.