ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Pilot Phase 2 Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Potential Efficacy of Etravirine in Friedreich Ataxia Patients.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04273165 (A Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Test the Safety and Efficacy of Etravirine in Friedreich Ataxia Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Test the Safety and Efficacy of Etravirine in Friedreich Ataxia Patients
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA drug repositioning effort supported the possible use of the anti-HIV drug etravirine as a disease-modifying drug for Friedreich ataxia (FRDA). Etravirine increases frataxin protein and corrects the biochemical defects in cells derived from FRDA patients. Because of these findings, and since etravirine displays a favorable safety profile, we conducted a pilot open-label phase 2 clinical trial assessing the safety and potential efficacy of etravirine in FRDA patients.
methodsThirty-five patients were stratified into three severity groups and randomized to etravirine 200 mg/day or 400 mg/day. They were treated for 4 months. Safety endpoints were the number and type of adverse events and number of dropouts. Efficacy endpoints were represented by changes in peak oxygen uptake and workload as measured by incremental exercise test, SARA score, cardiac measures, measures of QoL and disability. Data were collected 4 months before the start of the treatment (T - 4), at the start (T0), at the end (T4) and 4 months after the termination of the treatment (T + 4).
resultsEtravirine was reasonably tolerated, and adverse events were generally mild. Four months of etravirine treatment did not significantly increase the peak oxygen uptake but was associated with a change in the progression of the SARA score (
conclusionsIn this open trial etravirine treatment was safe, reasonably well tolerated and appreciably improved neurological function and exercise performance. Even though a placebo effect cannot be ruled out, these results suggest that etravirine may represent a potential therapeutic agent in FRDA deserving testing in a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.