Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39201729›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Regeneration and Plasticity Induced by Epidural Stimulation in a Rodent Model of Spinal Cord Injury.

Leonidas Gomes Angelin, Marcelo Nelson Páez Carreño, Jose Pinhata Otoch, Joyce Cristina Ferreira de Resende, Analía Arévalo, Lívia Clemente Motta-Teixeira, Marilia Cerqueira Leite Seelaender, Guilherme Lepski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leonidas Gomes AngelinLaboratory of Medical Investigation, LIM26, Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5437-0539
Marcelo Nelson Páez CarreñoMicroelectronics and Materials Laboratory, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2124-1623
Jose Pinhata OtochLaboratory of Medical Investigation, LIM26, Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.
Joyce Cristina Ferreira de ResendeLaboratory of Medical Investigation, LIM26, Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-8468-5178
Analía ArévaloLaboratory of Medical Investigation, LIM26, Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3793-8081
Lívia Clemente Motta-TeixeiraLaboratory of Neuroplasticity and Behaviour, Department of Physiological Sciences, Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences, Sao Paulo 01221-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2499-3177
Marilia Cerqueira Leite SeelaenderLaboratory of Medical Investigation, LIM26, Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.
Guilherme LepskiLaboratory of Medical Investigation, LIM26, Department of Experimental Surgery, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9030-4192

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88882327671/2019-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury is a major cause of disability for which there are currently no fully effective treatments. Recent studies using epidural electrical stimulation have shown significant advances in motor rehabilitation, even when applied during chronic phases of the disease. The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of epidural electric stimulation in the motor recovery of rats with spinal cord injury. Furthermore, we aimed to elucidate the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor recovery. First, we improved upon the impact spinal cord injury model to cause severe and permanent motor deficits lasting up to 2 months. Next, we developed and tested an implantable epidural spinal cord stimulator device for rats containing an electrode and an implantable generator. Finally, we evaluated the efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation on motor recovery after spinal cord injury in Wistar rats. A total of 60 animals were divided into the following groups: (i) severe injury with epidural electrical stimulation (injury + stim, n = 15), (ii) severe injury without stimulation (group injury, n = 15), (iii) sham implantation without battery (sham, n = 15), and (iv) a control group, without surgical intervention (control, n = 15). All animals underwent weekly evaluations using the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scale index, inclined plane, and OpenField test starting one week before the lesion and continuing for eight weeks. After this period, the animals were sacrificed and their spinal cords were explanted and prepared for histological analysis (hematoxylin-eosin) and immunohistochemistry for NeuN, β-III-tubulin, synaptophysin, and Caspase 3. Finally, NeuN-positive neuronal nuclei were quantified through stereology; fluorescence signal intensities for β-tubulin, synaptophyin, and Caspase 3 were quantified using an epifluorescence microscope. The injury + stim group showed significant improvement on the BBB scale compared with the injured group after the 5th week (

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalNeuronal PlasticityRats, WistarSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsAntigens, NuclearCaspase 3Electric Stimulation TherapyEpidural SpaceFemaleMaleNerve RegenerationNerve Tissue ProteinsRatsRecovery of FunctionSpinal CordAntigens, NuclearCaspase 3Nerve Tissue ProteinsRbfox3 protein, ratSynaptophysinSyp protein, ratTubb3 protein, ratTubulinepidural electric stimulationmotor recoveryneuroplasticityregenerationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID39201729
PMCPMC11354918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.