ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Opposite Contractile Effects of Amphetamine-Related Hallucinogenic Drugs in the Isolated Human Atrium.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study examined three hallucinogenic amphetamine derivatives, namely, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) as well as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) and 4-methylmethcathinone (mephedrone). The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that DOI, DOM, and mephedrone would increase the contractile force in isolated human atrial preparations in a manner similar to amphetamine. To this end, we measured contractile force under isometric conditions in electrically stimulated (1 Hz) human atrial preparations obtained during open surgery. DOI and DOM alone or in the presence of isoprenaline reduced the contractile force concentration-dependently in human atrial preparations. These negative inotropic effects of DOM and DOI were not attenuated by 10 µM atropine. However, mephedrone increased the contractile force in human atrial preparations in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. Furthermore, these effects were attenuated by the subsequent addition of 10 µM propranolol or pretreatment with 10 µM cocaine in the organ bath. Therefore, it can be concluded that amphetamine derivatives may exert opposing effects on cardiac contractile force. The precise mechanism by which DOI and DOM exert their negative inotropic effects remains unknown at present. The cardiac effects of mephedrone are probably due to the release of cardiac noradrenaline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.