ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Different Proteomic Profiles Regarding Antihypertensive Therapy in Preeclampsia Pregnant.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Second-trimester multimetabolite panel for early preeclampsia rule-out.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Causal relationships between metabolic syndrome, plasma metabolites, and female reproductive diseases: insights from a two-step mendelian randomization approach.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
- Pathophysiological mechanisms in severe preeclampsia: role of upregulated proteins in blood pressure, extracellular matrix and immunity.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) is a hypertensive pregnancy syndrome associated with target organ damage and increased cardiovascular risks, necessitating antihypertensive therapy. However, approximately 40% of patients are nonresponsive to treatment, which results in worse clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare circulating proteomic profiles and identify differentially expressed proteins among 10 responsive (R-PE), 10 nonresponsive (NR-PE) patients, and 10 healthy pregnant controls (HP). We also explored correlations between these proteins and clinical data. Plasma protein relative quantification was performed using mass spectrometry, followed by bioinformatics analyses with the UniProt database, PatternLab for Proteomics 4.0, and MetaboAnalyst software (version 6.0). Considering a fold change of 1.5, four proteins were differentially expressed between NR-PE and R-PE: one upregulated (fibronectin) and three downregulated (pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 1, complement C4B, and complement C4A). Between NR-PE and HP, six proteins were differentially expressed: two upregulated (clusterin and plasmin heavy chain A) and four downregulated (apolipoprotein L1, heparin cofactor II, complement C4B, and haptoglobin-related protein). Three proteins were differentially expressed between R-PE and HP: one downregulated (transthyretin) and two upregulated (apolipoprotein C1 and hemoglobin subunit beta). These findings suggest a complex interplay of these proteins involved in inflammatory, immune, and metabolic processes with antihypertensive therapy responsiveness and PE pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.