ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Development of Valid and Reliable Questionnaire to Evaluate Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) of Lifestyle Medicine Domains.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Adolescent Oral and Maxillofacial Health Knowledge-Attitude-Practice and Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (AOMH-KAPQ).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychiatrists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding the Use of Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy in Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Chongqing, China.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Assessment of practice and barriers to lifestyle medicine among physicians in Saudi Arabia-A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Impact of a lifestyle education program on family medicine residents' knowledge and attitudes: A pre- and post-intervention study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Patient-ventilator asynchrony knowledge, attitudes, and practices among ICU health care professionals: questionnaire development.Respiratory research & clinical practice · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of a Mobile Application with an AI-Powered Chatbot to Enhance Nursing Students' Awareness of Substance Abuse Prevention: An Interventional Study.F1000Research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lifestyle medicine (LM) should be incorporated as part of routine clinical work and medical education programs.
objectiveTo develop and test the validity and reliability of a questionnaire that measures the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of LM domains among medical trainees through practicing physicians.
methodsThe KAP questionnaire sections covered the nine domains of LM. The validation process included face and content validity. A total of 151 individuals from the medical field residing in Saudi Arabia were recruited through a convenient sampling technique to participate in the study. Item response theory (IRT) was applied to validate the knowledge domain, while exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to assess attitude and practice. Cronbach's alpha was performed to test the reliability of the three sections.
resultsThe questionnaire contained 37 items of knowledge, 45 attitudes, and 28 practice items. According to the IRT analysis, 27 items of knowledge were within the acceptable range of difficulty and discrimination. The EFA analysis resulted in 6 factors, including all the items in the attitude domain, and 4 factors, for a total of 27 items in the practice domain, with satisfactory factor loading (>0.4). The Cronbach's alpha for the three domains was very high (≥0.88).
conclusionsThe KAP questionnaire for LM is valid and reliable across a spectrum, from medical trainees to practicing physicians. This tool could serve as an instrument to evaluate and develop adequate educational programs for medical doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.