Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39201127›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Lessons of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Ambulance Service in Kazakhstan.

Assylzhan Messova, Lyudmila Pivina, Diana Ygiyeva, Gulnara Batenova, Almas Dyussupov, Ulzhan Jamedinova, Marat Syzdykbayev, Saltanat Adilgozhina, Arman Bayanbaev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Level of Patient Satisfaction with Quality of Primary Healthcare in Almaty During COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Assylzhan MessovaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Semey Medical University, Semey 071400, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-5373-0523
Lyudmila PivinaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Semey Medical University, Semey 071400, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-8035-4866
Diana YgiyevaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Semey Medical University, Semey 071400, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-8391-8842
Gulnara BatenovaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Semey Medical University, Semey 071400, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-3198-1860
Almas DyussupovDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Semey Medical University, Semey 071400, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2086-8873
Ulzhan JamedinovaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Semey Medical University, Semey 071400, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-1671-289X
Marat SyzdykbayevDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, Semey Medical University, Semey 071400, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-0561-4111
Saltanat AdilgozhinaDepartment of Family Medicine, Semey Medical University, Semey 071400, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-8408-7363
Arman BayanbaevNational Coordinating Center for Emergency Assistance, Astana 10000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-6016-4304

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan under Grant AP 14871609 "Optimizing the structure and improving the efficiency of the emergency medicine service in Kazakhstan by conducting training for AP 14871609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency medical services (EMS) are intended to provide people with immediate, effective, and safe access to the healthcare system. The effects of pandemics on emergency medical services (EMS) have not been studied sufficiently. The aim of this paper is to assess the frequency and structure of calls at an ambulance station in Kazakhstan during the period of 2019-2023.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted to estimate the incidence of emergency assistance cases from 2019 to 2023.

resultsAn analysis of the structure and number of ambulance calls before the pandemic, during the pandemic, and post-pandemic period did not reveal significant changes, except for calls in urgency category IV. Patients of urgency category IV handled by an ambulance decreased by 2 and 1.7 times in 2020 and 2021, respectively, which appears to be related to quarantine measures. In 2022 and 2023, category IV calls were 4.7 and 4.5 times higher than in 2019.

conclusionsThis study's findings suggest no changes in the dynamics of ambulance calls, except urgency category IV calls. The number of category IV urgent calls decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic and increased in the post-pandemic period.

Indexed as

ambulance serviceconsultationCOVID-19emergencyKazakhstan

Identifiers

PMID39201127
PMCPMC11353942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.