ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Comparative Evaluation of Temporomandibular Joint Parameters in Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Using Cone-Beam CT: Focus on Growing vs. Non-Growing Subjects.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CBCT-based assessment of temporomandibular joint morphology in adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a comparative study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Airway Analysis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMorphological differences in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) are crucial for the treatment of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). This study aims to evaluate and compare the TMJ parameters in patients with unilateral and bilateral CLP across growing and non-growing age groups using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
methodsCBCT records from 57 patients (23 males and 34 females) aged 6-50 years with a diagnosed unilateral or bilateral CLP were analyzed. Patients were categorized into four groups: growing unilateral (UGCLP), growing bilateral (BGCLP), non-growing unilateral (UNGCLP), and non-growing bilateral (BNGCLP). Measurements of TMJ parameters, including the mandibular fossa, articular eminence inclination, joint spaces, and roof thickness of the glenoid fossa, were conducted using CBCT images.
resultsSignificant differences were observed in the anterior joint space (AJS) and the roof of the glenoid fossa (RGF) between growing and non-growing unilateral cleft patients. Additionally, significant discrepancies were found in the articular eminence angle when comparing the cleft and non-cleft sides within the unilateral growing group. No significant differences were observed in TMJ parameters between the right and left sides among bilateral cleft patients.
conclusionsThe study highlights distinct TMJ morphological differences between growing and non-growing patients with CLP, emphasizing the importance of age-specific considerations in the treatment planning and growth monitoring of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.