Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39200944›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Robotic versus Mini-Laparoscopic Colposacropexy to Treat Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study and a Medicolegal Perspective.

Valentina Billone, Giuseppe Gullo, Girolamo Perino, Erika Catania, Gaspare Cucinella, Silvia Ganduscio, Alessandra Vassiliadis, Simona Zaami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. 2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valentina BilloneObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, AOOR Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe GulloObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, AOOR Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4269-4269
Girolamo PerinoObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, AOOR Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
Erika CataniaObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, AOOR Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
Gaspare CucinellaObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, AOOR Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
Silvia GanduscioObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, AOOR Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
Alessandra VassiliadisDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
Simona ZaamiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 90133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

colposacropexy (CS)evidence-based guidelinesmini-laparoscopyPOP (pelvic organ prolapse)robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39200944
PMCPMC11355471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.