Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39200786›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Diagnostics and Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions-New Techniques and Guidelines.

Jagoda Rogowska, Jan Semeradt, Łukasz Durko, Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Can abbreviated MRI replace standard protocols in IPMN surveillance? A retrospective comparative study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Endoscopic management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jagoda RogowskaDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland.
Jan SemeradtDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-6138-5102
Łukasz DurkoDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland.
Ewa Małecka-WojcieskoDepartment of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1825-1807

Funding

Medical University of Lodz, Poland. No. 503/1-002-01/503-11-001-19-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly diagnosed owing to the wide use of cross-sectional imaging techniques. Accurate identification of PCL categories is critical for determining the indications for surgical intervention or surveillance. The classification and management of PCLs rely on a comprehensive and interdisciplinary evaluation, integrating clinical data, imaging findings, and cyst fluid markers. EUS (endoscopic ultrasound) has become the widely used diagnostic tool for the differentiation of pancreatic cystic lesions, offering detailed evaluation of even small pancreatic lesions with high sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration enhances diagnostic capabilities through cytological analysis and the assessment of fluid viscosity, tumor glycoprotein concentration, amylase levels, and molecular scrutiny. These detailed insights play a pivotal role in improving the clinical prognosis and management of pancreatic neoplasms. This review will focus mainly on the latest recommendations for the differentiation, management, and treatment of pancreatic cystic lesions, highlighting their clinical significance.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasoundpancreatic cyst guidelinespancreatic cystic lesionspancreatic cystic neoplasmspancreatic cysts

Identifiers

PMID39200786
PMCPMC11355509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.