Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39200664›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Exploring COVID-19 Vaccine Decision Making: Insights from 'One-Shot Wonders' and 'Booster Enthusiasts'.

Josefina Nuñez Sahr, Angela M Parcesepe, William You, Denis Nash, Kate Penrose, Milton Leonard Wainberg, Subha Balasubramanian, Bai Xi Jasmine Chan, Rachael Piltch-Loeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josefina Nuñez SahrInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-1459-836X
Angela M ParcesepeThe Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
William YouInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Denis NashInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Kate PenroseInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7808-7439
Milton Leonard WainbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9390-4652
Subha BalasubramanianInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8540-2701
Bai Xi Jasmine ChanInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Rachael Piltch-LoebInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Funding

Brief digital intervention to increase COVID-19 vaccination among individuals with anxiety or depressionRF1MH132360 · NIMH · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI NASH, DENIS, PARCESEPE, ANGELA · 2022 to 2022
$3.3M
NIH HHS UH3 Act AI13367504S1NIMH NIH HHS 1RF1MH132360-01NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH132360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the USA, the uptake of the updated COVID-19 vaccines is suboptimal despite health authority recommendations. This study used qualitative methods to examine factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision making and the effects of anxiety and depression on these decisions within the CHASING COVID Cohort (C3). Between October and December 2023, we conducted 25 interviews with participants from 16 different US states, 14 of whom endorsed recent symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Using grounded theory methodology for coding and thematic analysis, we categorized participants into "One-Shot Wonders" and "Booster Enthusiasts". Our findings indicate that the US COVID-19 vaccination environment has shifted from active promotion to a notable absence of COVID-19 discussions, leading to reduced worry about infection and severe illness, diminished perception of the benefits of the vaccine on personal and community levels, and fewer cues to action. Initially influential factors like family, personal experiences, and physician recommendations lost impact over time. Although the relationship between symptoms of depression and anxiety and vaccination was not prominent, one case highlighted a direct relationship. The study emphasizes the importance of timely and accurate public health messaging adaptable to individuals' needs and misconceptions, highlighting the need for dynamic communication strategies in future initiatives with rapidly changing landscapes.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDecision MakingAdultAgedAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2United StatesVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesanxietyCOVID-19depressionhealth behaviorqualitative studiesvaccines

Identifiers

PMID39200664
PMCPMC11354829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.