Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39200487›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Elderflowers (

Agnieszka Nawirska-Olszańska, Joanna Kolniak-Ostek, Muhamad A Zubaidi, Damian Maksimowski, Pavla Brandova, Maciej Oziembłowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Agnieszka Nawirska-OlszańskaDepartment of Fruit, Vegetable and Plant Nutraceutical Technology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9417-767X
Joanna Kolniak-OstekDepartment of Fruit, Vegetable and Plant Nutraceutical Technology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1933-2852
Muhamad A ZubaidiDepartment of Fruit, Vegetable and Plant Nutraceutical Technology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0960-9715
Damian MaksimowskiDepartment of Functional Food Products Development, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland.
Pavla BrandovaResearch and Breeding Institute of Pomology, Holovousy, Ltd., 508 01 Holovousy, Czech Republic.
Maciej OziembłowskiDepartment of Functional Food Products Development, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7369-6051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elderflowers are used for both culinary and health purposes. Their composition and, therefore, their properties depend on the variety from which they were obtained. The aim of this study was to compare six cultivated varieties with the wild form. The research included determining the basic chemical composition, bioactive ingredients and antioxidant activity. This research confirms that elderberry flowers are rich in bioactive ingredients. The wild form turned out to be the most rich in bioactive ingredients, while among the tested varieties it was 'Weihenstephan'; both of these forms were characterized by a high content of polyphenols (394.36 and 377.75 mg/100 g dm, respectively) and antioxidant activity. The PCA analysis showed general differences in the chemical composition of elderberry flowers, depending on the variety, in relation to 23 variables, as well as showing their mutual correlations and the strength of their influence on the PCA model.

Indexed as

antioxidant activityelderflowersorganic acidspolyphenolssugar

Identifiers

PMID39200487
PMCPMC11354468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.