Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39200420›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Advancements in Pulse Starches: Exploring Non-Thermal Modification Methods.

Pranita Mhaske, Asgar Farahnaky, Mahsa Majzoobi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Starch-Based Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production: Challenges and Perspectives.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pranita MhaskeAFB International, 3 Research Park Drive, St. Charles, MO 63304, USA.
Asgar FarahnakyBiosciences and Food Technology, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Plenty Road, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Mahsa MajzoobiBiosciences and Food Technology, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Plenty Road, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0048-7707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surge in the global demand for plant-based proteins has catapulted pulse protein into the spotlight. To ensure economic viability and sustainable production, it is crucial to utilize pulse starch, a by-product of plant protein fractionation. Despite the increasing interest in pulse starches, there is a notable gap in knowledge regarding their modifications and applications compared to cereal and tuber starches. Non-thermal techniques such as electron beam radiation, static high pressure, microfluidization, and cold plasma are emerging as innovative methods for starch modification. These techniques offer significant advantages, including enhanced safety, environmental sustainability, and the development of unique functional properties unattainable through conventional methods. However, challenges such as equipment availability, high costs, and energy consumption hinder their widespread adoption. In light of the growing emphasis on "clean and green labelling" and effective "waste management" in food production, evaluating non-thermal techniques for pulse starch modification is critical. This review aims to thoroughly assess these non-thermal techniques and their combinations, offering valuable insights for researchers and the food industry. By maximizing the potential of pulse starches in innovative food applications, it provides a comprehensive guide for effective non-thermal methods that add value and align with sustainable practices.

Indexed as

clean label ingredientsnon-thermal modificationpulse starchstarch value addition

Identifiers

PMID39200420
PMCPMC11353720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.