ArticleBiomedicines2024
A General Method to Screen Nanobodies for Cytochrome P450 Enzymes from a Yeast Surface Display Library.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The availability of yeast surface display nanobody (Nb) libraries offers a convenient way to acquire antigen-specific nanobodies that may be useful for protein structure-function studies and/or therapeutic applications, complementary to the conventional method of acquiring nanobodies through immunization in camelids. In this study, we developed a general approach to select nanobodies for cytochrome P450 enzymes from a highly diverse yeast display library. We tested our method on three P450 enzymes including CYP102A1, neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), and the complex of CYP2B4:POR, using a novel streamlined approach where biotinylated P450s were bound to fluorescent-labeled streptavidin for Nb screening. The Nb-antigen binders were selectively enriched using magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). After two rounds of MACS, the population of positive binders was enriched by >5-fold compared to the naïve library. The subsequent FACS selection, with a gating of 0.1%, identified 634, 270, and 215 positive binders for CYP102A1, nNOS, and CYP2B4:POR, respectively. The positive binders for CYP102A1 were further triaged based on EC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.