ReviewBiomedicines2024
The Possible Pathophysiological Role of Pancreatic Stone Protein in Sepsis and Its Potential Therapeutic Implication.
Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum Pancreatic Stone Protein Across the Spectrum of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Discrimination of Preeclampsia Compared with Conventional Inflammatory Indices.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Pancreatic Stone Protein in Burns: Clinical Value of Bedside Testing-A Prospective Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Plasma pancreatic stone protein is a promising biomarker for prognosis and severity outcome in sepsis patients with COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pancreatic Stone Protein as a Versatile Biomarker: Current Evidence and Clinical Applications.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Reassessing sepsis research: new clues for old players and new players for an old symptom to improve patient outcomes.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
- Pancreatic stone protein inhibits pyroptosis of pancreatic acinar cells in sepsis-associated pancreatic injury.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the current understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis, key host dysregulated responses leading to organ failure are mediated by innate immunity, through interactions between pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damaged-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) binding to four types of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). PRRs activation triggers the protein kinase cascade, initiating the cellular response seen during sepsis. Pancreatic stone protein (PSP), a C-type lectin protein, is a well-defined biomarker of sepsis. Studies have shown that stressed and immune-activated pancreatic β-cells secrete PSP. Animal studies have shown that PSP injection aggravates sepsis, and that the disease severity score and mortality were directly correlated with the doses of PSP injected. In humans, studies have shown that PSP activates polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) and aggravates multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Clinical studies have shown that PSP levels are correlated with disease severity, vasopressor support, progression to organ failure, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, length of stay, and mortality. As PSP is a C-type lectin protein, it may have a role in activating innate immunity through the C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), which is one of the four PRRs. Herein, we review the literature on PSP and its possible role in the pathophysiology of sepsis, and we discuss its potential therapeutic role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.