ReviewBiomedicines2024
Review of Myocardial Ischemia, Scar, and Viability Estimation with Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-Stage Dynamic Synergistic Segmentation Method for Myocardial Pathology.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Targeting Reactive Oxygen Species for Diagnosis of Various Diseases.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular diseases, particularly myocardial ischemia from coronary artery obstruction, remain a leading cause of global morbidity. This review explores cardiac molecular magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) and other molecular imaging techniques for the evaluation of myocardial ischemia, scarring, and viability. RESULTS AND
findingsmMRI imaging methods provide detailed information on myocardial ischemia, edema, and scar tissue using techniques like cine imaging, T1 and T2 mapping, and gadolinium-based contrast agents. These methods enable the precise assessment of the myocardial tissue properties, crucial in diagnosing and treating cardiovascular diseases. Advanced techniques, such as the T1ρ and RAFFn methods, might provide enhanced contrast and sensitivity for the detection of myocardial scarring without contrast agents. Molecular probes, including gadolinium-based and protein-targeted contrast agents, improve the detection of molecular changes, facilitating early diagnosis and personalized treatment. Integrating MRI with positron emission tomography (PET) combines the high spatial and temporal resolution with molecular and functional imaging.
conclusionRecent advancements in mMRI and molecular imaging have changed the evaluation of myocardial ischemia, scarring, and viability. Despite significant progress, extensive research is needed to validate these techniques clinically and further develop imaging methods for better diagnostic and prognostic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.