Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39200086›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Rapid Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Approaches for Use in the Clinical Laboratory.

Siham Hattab, Adrienne H Ma, Zoon Tariq, Ilianne Vega Prado, Ian Drobish, Rachel Lee, Rebecca Yee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Reducing time-to-result in bloodstream infections: comparative evaluation of VITEK® REVEAL™ and QuickMIC® for rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Point of care antimicrobial susceptibility testing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in the Management of RefractoryGastro hep advances · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Multicenter evaluation of the QuickMICEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siham HattabDepartment of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Adrienne H MaDepartment of Pharmacy, Valley View Hospital, Glenwood Springs, CO 81647, USA.
Zoon TariqDepartment of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Ilianne Vega PradoDepartment of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Ian DrobishCritical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Rachel LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0067-311X
Rebecca YeeDepartment of Pathology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5439-4218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid rise in increasingly resistant bacteria has become a major threat to public health. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is crucial in guiding appropriate therapeutic decisions and infection prevention practices for patient care. However, conventional culture-based AST methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Therefore, rapid AST approaches exist to address the delayed gap in time to actionable results. There are two main types of rapid AST technologies- phenotypic and genotypic approaches. In this review, we provide a summary of all commercially available rapid AST platforms for use in clinical microbiology laboratories. We describe the technologies utilized, performance characteristics, acceptable specimen types, types of resistance detected, turnaround times, limitations, and clinical outcomes driven by these rapid tests. We also discuss crucial factors to consider for the implementation of rapid AST technologies in a clinical laboratory and what the future of rapid AST holds.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancediagnosticsinfection preventionmolecular technologiesmultiplex PCRrapid antimicrobial susceptibility

Identifiers

PMID39200086
PMCPMC11351821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.