Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39199765›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Enhancing Forensic Diagnostics: Structured Reporting of Post-Mortem CT versus Autopsy for Laryngohyoid Complex Fractures in Strangulation.

Andreas M Bucher, Adrian Koppold, Mattias Kettner, Sarah Kölzer, Julia Dietz, Eric Frodl, Alexey Surov, Daniel Pinto Dos Santos, Thomas J Vogl, Marcel A Verhoff and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andreas M BucherInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Haus 23c, UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9194-5955
Adrian KoppoldInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Haus 23c, UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Mattias KettnerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Sarah KölzerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Julia DietzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Haus 23c, UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Eric FrodlInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Haus 23c, UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Alexey SurovUniversitätsinstitut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Johannes Wesling Universitätsklinikum Minden, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Hans-Nolte-Strasse 1, 32429 Minden, Germany.
Daniel Pinto Dos SantosInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Haus 23c, UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Thomas J VoglInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Haus 23c, UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-1075
Marcel A VerhoffInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Martin BeeresInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University, Haus 23c, UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5625-7196
Constantin LuxInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Sara HeinbuchDepartment of Psychiatry, Clinic for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, SHG-Kliniken Sonnenberg, Sonnenbergstraße 10, 66119 Saarbruecken, Germany.

Funding

NUM 2.0 FKZ: 01KX2121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to establish a standardized structured workflow to compare findings from high-resolution, optimized reconstructions from post-mortem computed tomography (pmCT) with autopsy results in the detection of fractures of the laryngohyoid complex in strangulation victims.

methodForty-two strangulation cases were selected, and pmCT scans of the laryngohyoid complex were obtained. Both pmCT scans and autopsy reports were analyzed using a structured template and compared using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) and the McNemar test. The study also compared the prevalence of ossa sesamoidea and non-fusion of the major and minor horns of the hyoid bone between both diagnostic methods.

resultsThe detection of fractures showed a very good correlation between autopsy and pmCT results (κ = 0.905), with the McNemar test showing no statistically significant difference between the two methods. PmCT identified 28 sesamoid bones, 45 non-fusions of the major horns, and 47 non-fusions of the minor horns of the hyoid bone, compared to four, six, and zero, respectively, identified by autopsy (

conclusionsAutopsy and pmCT findings correlate well and can be used in a complementary manner. PmCT is superior to autopsy in identifying dislocations and detecting anatomical variations in the laryngohyoid complex, which can lead to misinterpretations during autopsy. Therefore, we do not advocate replacing autopsy with pmCT but propose using a structured workflow, including our standardized reporting template, for evaluating lesions in the laryngohyoid complex.

Indexed as

autopsyfractureslaryngohyoid complexpost-mortem computed tomography (pmCT)strangulationstructured reporting

Identifiers

PMID39199765
PMCPMC11352193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.