ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Emotion Detection from EEG Signals Using Machine Deep Learning Models.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of EEG-based biomarkers for depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder: trends in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Distinguishing Early Depression from Negative Emotion via Multi-Domain EEG Feature Fusion and Multi-Head Additive Attention Network.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving career guidance accuracy through EEG-based vocational interest assessment and self-reported RIASEC profiles.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Application of a parametric supermatrix multi-task multimodal deep learning model based on electroencephalogram and peripheral physiological signal fusion in emotion recognition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Segmentation-enhanced approach for emotion detection from EEG signals using the fuzzy C-mean and SVM.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cross-Subject Emotion Recognition with CT-ELCAN: Leveraging Cross-Modal Transformer and Enhanced Learning-Classify Adversarial Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Resource-Efficient Multi-Entropy Fusion Method and Its Application for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning for electroencephalography emotion recognition.AIMS public health · 2025Article
- Measuring emotions triggered by fragrance through behavioral paradigms.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Dynamic emotion recognition and learning motivation prediction in Chinese second language acquisition under cultural differences: a study based on ED-CM-MP model.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting emotions is a growing field aiming to comprehend and interpret human emotions from various data sources, including text, voice, and physiological signals. Electroencephalogram (EEG) is a unique and promising approach among these sources. EEG is a non-invasive monitoring technique that records the brain's electrical activity through electrodes placed on the scalp's surface. It is used in clinical and research contexts to explore how the human brain responds to emotions and cognitive stimuli. Recently, its use has gained interest in real-time emotion detection, offering a direct approach independent of facial expressions or voice. This is particularly useful in resource-limited scenarios, such as brain-computer interfaces supporting mental health. The objective of this work is to evaluate the classification of emotions (positive, negative, and neutral) in EEG signals using machine learning and deep learning, focusing on Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNN), based on the analysis of critical attributes of the EEG signal (Differential Entropy (DE), Power Spectral Density (PSD), Differential Asymmetry (DASM), Rational Asymmetry (RASM), Asymmetry (ASM), Differential Causality (DCAU)). The electroencephalography dataset used in the research was the public SEED dataset (SJTU Emotion EEG Dataset), obtained through auditory and visual stimuli in segments from Chinese emotional movies. The experiment employed to evaluate the model results was "subject-dependent". In this method, the Deep Neural Network (DNN) achieved an accuracy of 86.08%, surpassing SVM, albeit with significant processing time due to the optimization characteristics inherent to the algorithm. The GCNN algorithm achieved an average accuracy of 89.97% in the subject-dependent experiment. This work contributes to emotion detection in EEG, emphasizing the effectiveness of different models and underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate features and the ethical use of these technologies in practical applications. The GCNN emerges as the most promising methodology for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.