Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39199740›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Emotion Detection from EEG Signals Using Machine Deep Learning Models.

João Vitor Marques Rabelo Fernandes, Auzuir Ripardo de Alexandria, João Alexandre Lobo Marques, Débora Ferreira de Assis, Pedro Crosara Motta, Bruno Riccelli Dos Santos Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

João Vitor Marques Rabelo FernandesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Telecomunicações, Instituto Federal do Ceará (IFCE), Fortaleza 60040-215, Brazil.
Auzuir Ripardo de AlexandriaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Telecomunicações, Instituto Federal do Ceará (IFCE), Fortaleza 60040-215, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-5366
João Alexandre Lobo MarquesLaboratory of Applied Neurosciences (LAN), University of Saint Joseph, Saint Joseph 999078, Macau.ORCID 0000-0002-6472-8784
Débora Ferreira de AssisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Teleinformática, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza 60455-760, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0750-5784
Pedro Crosara MottaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-598, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1849-2018
Bruno Riccelli Dos Santos SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Teleinformática, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza 60455-760, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8189-7187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting emotions is a growing field aiming to comprehend and interpret human emotions from various data sources, including text, voice, and physiological signals. Electroencephalogram (EEG) is a unique and promising approach among these sources. EEG is a non-invasive monitoring technique that records the brain's electrical activity through electrodes placed on the scalp's surface. It is used in clinical and research contexts to explore how the human brain responds to emotions and cognitive stimuli. Recently, its use has gained interest in real-time emotion detection, offering a direct approach independent of facial expressions or voice. This is particularly useful in resource-limited scenarios, such as brain-computer interfaces supporting mental health. The objective of this work is to evaluate the classification of emotions (positive, negative, and neutral) in EEG signals using machine learning and deep learning, focusing on Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNN), based on the analysis of critical attributes of the EEG signal (Differential Entropy (DE), Power Spectral Density (PSD), Differential Asymmetry (DASM), Rational Asymmetry (RASM), Asymmetry (ASM), Differential Causality (DCAU)). The electroencephalography dataset used in the research was the public SEED dataset (SJTU Emotion EEG Dataset), obtained through auditory and visual stimuli in segments from Chinese emotional movies. The experiment employed to evaluate the model results was "subject-dependent". In this method, the Deep Neural Network (DNN) achieved an accuracy of 86.08%, surpassing SVM, albeit with significant processing time due to the optimization characteristics inherent to the algorithm. The GCNN algorithm achieved an average accuracy of 89.97% in the subject-dependent experiment. This work contributes to emotion detection in EEG, emphasizing the effectiveness of different models and underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate features and the ethical use of these technologies in practical applications. The GCNN emerges as the most promising methodology for future research.

Indexed as

deep learningelectroencephalogramemotion detectionemotion recognitiongraph convolutional neural networksmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39199740
PMCPMC11351761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.