ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Single-Trial Detection and Classification of Event-Related Optical Signals for a Brain-Computer Interface Application.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural dynamics of visuospatial endogenous attention: Event-related optical signal evidence from posterior brain areas.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Event-related optical signals (EROS) measure fast modulations in the brain's optical properties related to neuronal activity. EROS offer a high spatial and temporal resolution and can be used for brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. However, the ability to classify single-trial EROS remains unexplored. This study evaluates the performance of neural network methods for single-trial classification of motor response-related EROS. EROS activity was obtained from a high-density recording montage covering the motor cortex during a two-choice reaction time task involving responses with the left or right hand. This study utilized a convolutional neural network (CNN) approach to extract spatiotemporal features from EROS data and perform classification of left and right motor responses. Subject-specific classifiers trained on EROS phase data outperformed those trained on intensity data, reaching an average single-trial classification accuracy of around 63%. Removing low-frequency noise from intensity data is critical for achieving discriminative classification results with this measure. Our results indicate that deep learning with high-spatial-resolution signals, such as EROS, can be successfully applied to single-trial classifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.