Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39199733›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Biohacking Nerve Repair: Novel Biomaterials, Local Drug Delivery, Electrical Stimulation, and Allografts to Aid Surgical Repair.

Jordan R Crabtree, Chilando M Mulenga, Khoa Tran, Konstantin Feinberg, J Paul Santerre, Gregory H Borschel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jordan R CrabtreeDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1157-4873
Chilando M MulengaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Khoa TranDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Konstantin FeinbergDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7565-4680
J Paul SanterreInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College St Room 407, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3373-6463
Gregory H BorschelDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regenerative capacity of the peripheral nervous system is limited, and peripheral nerve injuries often result in incomplete healing and poor outcomes even after repair. Transection injuries that induce a nerve gap necessitate microsurgical intervention; however, even the current gold standard of repair, autologous nerve graft, frequently results in poor functional recovery. Several interventions have been developed to augment the surgical repair of peripheral nerves, and the application of functional biomaterials, local delivery of bioactive substances, electrical stimulation, and allografts are among the most promising approaches to enhance innate healing across a nerve gap. Biocompatible polymers with optimized degradation rates, topographic features, and other functions provided by their composition have been incorporated into novel nerve conduits (NCs). Many of these allow for the delivery of drugs, neurotrophic factors, and whole cells locally to nerve repair sites, mitigating adverse effects that limit their systemic use. The electrical stimulation of repaired nerves in the perioperative period has shown benefits to healing and recovery in human trials, and novel biomaterials to enhance these effects show promise in preclinical models. The use of acellular nerve allografts (ANAs) circumvents the morbidity of donor nerve harvest necessitated by the use of autografts, and improvements in tissue-processing techniques may allow for more readily available and cost-effective options. Each of these interventions aid in neural regeneration after repair when applied independently, and their differing forms, benefits, and methods of application present ample opportunity for synergistic effects when applied in combination.

Indexed as

allograftautograftelectrical stimulationnerve conduitnerve regenerationperipheral nerve injury

Identifiers

PMID39199733
PMCPMC11352148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.