ArticleCancers2024
Molecular Diagnostic Yield and Safety Profile of Ultrasound-Guided Lung Biopsies: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Innovative technologies and their clinical prospects for early lung cancer screening.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Multidimensional institutional learning curve of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy: a cumulative sum analysis with case-mix assessment.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Imaging and AI in tertiary prevention of lung cancer: Narrative review and clinical perspectives.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging Strategies in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma: An Overview.Thoracic cancer · 2026Review
- Is Immunotherapy a Contraindication for Treating Lung Cancer Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases? A Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe recent advances in precision oncology for lung cancer treatment has focused attention on the importance of obtaining appropriate specimens for tissue diagnosis as well as comprehensive molecular profiling. CT scan-guided biopsies and bronchoscopy are currently the main procedures employed for tissue sampling. However, growing evidence suggests that ultrasound-guided biopsies may represent an effective as well as safe approach in this diagnostic area. This study explores the safety and the diagnostic yield for cancer molecular profiling in ultrasound-guided percutaneous lung lesion biopsies (US-PLLB).
methodsOne hundred consecutive patients with suspected lung cancer, between January 2021 and May 2024, who had ultrasound-guided lung biopsies have been retrospectively analyzed. Molecular profiling was conducted with next-generation sequencing Genexus using Oncomine precision assay or polymerase chain reaction according to specimen quality. Qualitative immunohistochemical assay of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was evaluated by the Dako PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx assay. The co-primary endpoints were the molecular diagnostic yield and the safety profile of US-guided lung biopsies.
resultsFrom January 2021 to May 2024, 100 US-guided lung biopsies were carried out and 95 were considered for inclusion in the study. US-PLLB provided informative tissue for a histological evaluation in 93 of 95 patients with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 96.84% [Sensitivity: 92.63%; Specificity: 96.84%; PPV: 100%; NPV: 100%]. Sixty-Six patients were diagnosed with NSCLC (69.47%) and were considered for molecular diagnostic yield evaluation and PD-L1 testing. Four patients had malignant lymphoid lesions. US-PLLB was not adequate to achieve a final diagnosis in three patients (3.16%). Complete molecular profiling and PD-L1 evaluation were achieved in all patients with adenocarcinoma (molecular diagnostic yield: 100%). PD-L1 evaluation was achieved in 28 of 29 patients (96.55%) with either SCC or NOS lung cancer. The overall complication rate was 9.47% (n = 9). Six patients (6.31%) developed pneumothorax, while three patients (3.16%) suffered mild haemoptysis without desaturation.
conclusionsAccording to our findings, US-guided lung biopsy is a safe, minimally invasive procedure in patients with suspected lung malignancies, providing an excellent diagnostic yield for both comprehensive molecular profiling and PD-L1 testing. In addition, our results suggest that US-guided biopsy may also be an effective diagnostic approach in patients with suspected lung lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.