ReviewAccounts of chemical research2024
Synthesis at the Interface of Chemistry and Biology.
Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthesis and In Vivo Incorporation of 4-Difluoromethyl-L-Phenylalanine Into Proteins.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
- Enhanced screening via a pure DNA-encoded peptide library enabled by an Fmoc modification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Direct Editing of Cysteine to Electrophilic Alkyl Halides in Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical synthesis as a tool to control the structure and properties of matter is at the heart of chemistry─from the synthesis of fine chemicals and polymers to drugs and solid-state materials. But as the field evolves to tackle larger and larger molecules and molecular complexes, the traditional tools of synthetic chemistry become limiting. In contrast, Mother Nature has developed very different strategies to create the macromolecules and molecular systems that make up the living cell. Our focus has been to ask whether we can use the synthetic strategies and machinery of Mother Nature, together with modern chemical tools, to create new macromolecules, and even whole organisms with properties not existing in nature. One such example involves reprogramming the complex, multicomponent machinery of ribosomal protein synthesis to add new building blocks to the genetic code, overcoming a billion-year constraint on the chemical nature of proteins. This methodology exploits the concept of bioorthogonality to add unique codons, tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to cells to encode amino acids with physical, chemical and biological properties not found in nature. As a result, we can make precise changes to the structures of proteins, much like those made by chemists to small molecules and beyond those possible by biological approaches alone. This technology has made it possible to probe protein structure and function
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.