Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198929›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Validation of the PCL-5 in Dutch trauma-exposed adults.

Chris M Hoeboer, Irina Karaban, Jeanet F Karchoud, Miranda Olff, Mirjam van Zuiden

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chris M HoeboerDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, Amsterdam, 1005 AZ, The Netherlands. c.m.hoeboer@amsterdamumc.nl.
Irina KarabanDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, Amsterdam, 1005 AZ, The Netherlands.
Jeanet F KarchoudDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, Amsterdam, 1005 AZ, The Netherlands.
Miranda OlffDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, Amsterdam, 1005 AZ, The Netherlands.
Mirjam van ZuidenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, Amsterdam, 1005 AZ, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 636340004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is an internationally widely used self-report questionnaire that can be used to screen for probable diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Information on the psychometric properties of the Dutch PCL-5 is currently lacking.

objectiveWe aimed to validate the Dutch PCL-5 in a sample of Dutch adults with prior (suspected) serious injury and establish the optimal cut-off for probable PTSD diagnosis herein.

methodsData for the current study were collected as part of a long-term follow-up measurement of the TraumaTIPS cohort, where adults admitted to an emergency department following (suspected) serious injury completed a follow-up measurement 12-15 years post-trauma. Of N = 333 eligible participants, n = 192 (57.7%) consented and completed the PCL-5 alongside self-report instruments measuring depression (QIDS), PTSD (IES-R), and quality of life (WHO-QOL and EQ-6D). In total, n = 185 participants also completed a clinician administered interview for PTSD (CAPS-5). Most participants were men (66%) and on average 54 years old (SD = 12.41). We evaluated the diagnostic utility of the PCL-5 using Youden index and tested reliability and convergent validity.

resultsThe PCL-5 demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy with a cut-off point of 16 resulting in an optimal Youden index (0.90) for screening purposes with a high sensitivity (1.00) and specificity (0.90). A cut-off of 22 yielded a slightly lower Youden index (0.84) but better positive predictive value (0.50 instead of 0.33) than the cut-off of 16. A cut-off of 29 resulted in the most accurate prevalence estimates. The PCL-5 showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94), excellent inter-item and item-total correlations and good convergent validity (r > .5 for CAPS-5, IES-R and QIDS).

conclusionsThe PCL-5 is a reliable and valid measurement for PTSD symptoms and probable diagnosis and shows excellent screening abilities in Dutch adults with prior (suspected) serious injury, with a lower optimal cut-off compared to previously found in clinical populations. We recommend a cut-off of 22 for screening purposes and a cut-off of 29 for prevalence estimates in Dutch trauma-exposed adults.

Indexed as

PsychometricsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdultAgedChecklistFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39198929
PMCPMC11351185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.