ArticleDiagnostic pathology2024
Exploring LGR5 as a prognostic marker of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: insights from expression analysis and clinical correlations.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative multi-omics analysis identifies stellate cell-derived complement component 7 as a predictor of fibrosis and liver-related events in MASLD.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) is a cancer stem cell (CSC) marker of colorectal cancer and may be a CSC marker of other cancer types. Few studies have been conducted on LGR5 expression in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC).
methodsWe analyzed LGR5 expression using RNAscope, a highly sensitive RNA in situ hybridization technique. Fifty-three ECCs were selected from the medical archives at Shinshu University Hospital and analyzed using a tissue microarray. LGR5 expression levels were divided into expression and no expression groups. LGR5 expression and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed.
resultsAmong 25 cases, no LGR5-positive dots were identified. Among 28 cases, some LGR5-positive dots were observed in carcinoma cells, together with a wide range of LGR5-positive cells. LGR5 expression was conspicuous in glandular duct formations. Well- to moderately differentiated types showed significantly higher LGR5 expression than the poorly differentiated type (p = 0.0268). LGR5 expression was associated with good overall survival (p = 0.0219) and good disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.0228). High LGR5 expression was associated with well- to moderately-differentiated types, indicating a favorable prognosis. In terms of DFS, multivariate analysis showed that high LGR5 expression was an independent favorable prognostic factor (p = 0.0397).
conclusionsThese findings suggest that LGR5 is a promising, novel prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.